Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBC News

As Australia puts more focus on climate change, New Zealand is accused of pulling back

Mahalia Dobson
Updated
7 min read
Australia's spectacular Great Barrier Reef is experiencing the most widespread bleaching on record, with 73 percent of surveyed reefs damaged.  (David Gray / AFP via Getty Images)
A marine biologist inspecting bleached and dead coral around Lizard Island on Australia’s Great Barrier Reef in April.
Generate Key Takeaways

Two major countries’ approach to climate change has turned upside down Down Under.

Australia and New Zealand, whose governments both changed hands in their most recent national elections, have undergone a role reversal of sorts when it comes to climate change, with consequences for their own populations as well as the South Pacific region, where they are the dominant players.

According to the United Nations, the Asia-Pacific is the most disaster-prone region in the world, with nearly 80% of the world’s climate-induced displacement taking place there.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rising sea levels, ocean warming and acidification, unpredictable rainfall patterns and prolonged droughts have an especially big impact on tiny Pacific Island nations such as Palau, Tuvalu and Kiribati, threatening their socioeconomic viability, tourism industries and very existence as the ocean swallows more of their land.

Australia, long known as a climate “laggard,” has taken a more aggressive stance under the Labor government of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

New Zealand, meanwhile, has been accused of pulling back on its climate goals under the Conservative government of Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, who succeeded former Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern last year.

Luxon told Radio New Zealand’s “Morning Report” last month he “rejects” such criticism and that his government is “deeply committed to net carbon zero 2050” and prioritizing the development of renewable energy. His office did not respond to a request for comment.

Lalomanu beach was badly affected by the 2009 tsunami that was generated by two massive earthquakes that killed hundreds in Samoa, American Samoa, and in Niuatoputapu, Tonga.  (Manaui Faulalo / AFP via Getty Images)
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres during a visit to Samoa’s tsunami-affected Lalomanu beach in August.

Though the country of 5 million is a relatively small greenhouse gas emitter on a global basis, it has one of the highest per capita emissions rates among the 38 major countries that make up the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“We’re not the poster country that we used to be,” said Ralph Sims, a professor of sustainable energy at Massey University in New Zealand.

Critics argue that both countries are falling short as they head to this year’s United Nations Climate Change Conference, or COP29, which starts Monday in Azerbaijan.

“I don’t think they have a great image for what they’re doing in the region,” Sarah Clement, an associate professor in environmental policy at the Australian National University, said of Australia.

Australia: Big promises from a fossil fuel giant

When Albanese came to power in 2022, he vowed to lead the country out of the climate “naughty corner.” His foreign minister, Penny Wong, said the new Labor government would “stand shoulder to shoulder with our Pacific family” in the fight against climate change.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The government legislated higher emissions reductions targets, introduced a “safeguard mechanism” that would act as a carbon cap for the country’s biggest emitters and negotiated a vehicle efficiency standard aimed at disincentivizing the use of high-polluting cars.

But critics including the Climate Action Tracker say the Australian government has “failed to deliver” on its climate promises.

“We have seen a positive change in terms of rhetoric and announcements since the 2022 election. Whether that is translated into actual action and outcomes is another story,” said Polly Hemming, director of the climate and energy program at the Australia Institute, an independent public policy think tank.

“Standing shoulder to shoulder with Pacific Island nations seems not to mean doing anything Pacific Island leaders have asked,” Hemming said.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Albanese’s office and the office of his minister for climate change and energy, Chris Bowen, did not respond to requests for comment.

Australia came in for special criticism last month at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in the Pacific Island nation of Samoa. Senior officials from Tuvalu, Vanuatu and Fiji pointed to a report that found Australia, Canada and Britain are responsible for 60% of emissions generated by fossil fuel extraction across the 56 members of the Commonwealth since 1990, despite representing only 6% of the Commonwealth’s population.

Wong responded that Australia cannot be held responsible for emissions from coal and gas it exports to other countries.

Australia coal fired power plant (James Bugg / Bloomberg via Getty Images file)
The coal-fired Loy Yang Power Station in Traralgon, Australia, in November 2023.

Critics argue that the Albanese government, like its conservative predecessor, is more wedded to fossil fuel interests than tackling climate change in any substantive way.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Australia is the world’s third-largest fossil fuel exporter after Russia and the United States. Researchers at Climate Analytics, a global climate science and policy institute based in Berlin, found that Australia is responsible for about 4.5% of global carbon emissions, with 80% of those emissions coming from its fossil fuel exports.

“They’re just not giving the same amount of money or legislative support to renewable energy or green manufacturing as they are to fossil fuels,” Hemming said.

According to the Australia Institute, in the 2023-24 budget, the Australian government provided about 11.8 billion Australian dollars ($7.9 billion) in subsidies to fossil fuel producers and major consumers.

“It’s just a really antiquated way of looking at economic development,” Clement said.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“It would take a lot of courage to remove those subsidies, but that right there would be a huge source of income that you could use to invest in renewables.”

Although the International Energy Agency says all unabated coal and oil power plants must be phased out by 2040 to limit the effects of global warming, this year the Australian government allowed three coal mines in the state of New South Wales to extend their operations for another three to four decades.

Pacific Island nations have long urged Australia to phase out fossil fuel production. This will be a key sticking point as Australia lobbies to co-host the U.N. climate change conference in 2026 alongside its Pacific neighbors.

Coal Operations in NSW as Australia's Government Seeks Commitment fort Power Generation (David Gray / Bloomberg via Getty Images file)
A freight train transporting coal through the Australian state of New South Wales in 2020.

New Zealand: Faltering climate leadership

By contrast, New Zealand has long had a global green image.

Advertisement
Advertisement

But it is now run by its most conservative government in decades, which aims to reverse a ban on offshore oil and gas exploration, double mineral exports by 2035 and establish a “fast track” for major development projects that bypasses environmental approvals and conservation concerns.

The country no longer offers subsidies for electric vehicles and delayed the introduction of world-first agricultural emissions pricing to the next decade, despite almost half of the country’s emissions coming from agriculture.

In a statement to NBC News, New Zealand Climate Change Minister Simon Watts said the government was focusing on a technology-led approach to managing agricultural emissions and had committed more than $400 million to that effort over the next four years.

Sims said New Zealand will be required to buy billions of offshore credits if it’s going to reach its Paris Agreement goals of reducing emissions to 30% below 2005 levels by 2030 and achieving net zero by 2050.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“It’s going to be very challenging for New Zealand to meet its obligations without being much more stringent on reducing its domestic emissions,” Sims said.

New Zealand's government on Tuesday, Oct. 11, 2022 proposed taxing the greenhouse gasses that farm animals make from burping and peeing as part of a plan to tackle climate change. (AP Photo/Mark Baker, File) (Mark Baker / AP file)
Dairy cows grazing on a farm near Oxford, New Zealand, in 2018.

Watts said the New Zealand government was focusing on a technology-led approach to managing agricultural emissions and had committed more than $400 million to that effort over the next four years. He said the government was committed to meeting its climate change goals and is on track to achieve net zero by 2050.

Nathan Cooper, an associate professor and convenor of international engagement at the University of Waikato, said the government was prioritizing adaptation over mitigation, a strategy that has been criticized as relying too heavily on technology that may never materialize.

“It’s a big risk,” Cooper said.

Advertisement
Advertisement

With its climate leadership perceived to be weakening, New Zealand may get a cooler reception at COP than in previous years, especially from Pacific Island nations, Cooper said.

High on the agenda in Azerbaijan will be a global climate finance goal for after 2025, when the current goal of $100 billion per year expires.

In August, a coalition of Australian and New Zealand NGOs called on the two countries to declare their support for a new goal of $1 trillion a year to help Pacific Island and other lower-income countries mitigate and adapt to the effects of climate change.

The power and leadership that Australia could bring to multilateral negotiations “would be absolutely extraordinary,” Hemming said, “especially in conjunction with these small island developing states that Australia likes to call family.”

This article was originally published on NBCNews.com

Advertisement
Advertisement