Los Angeles Times Editorial Page Editor Resigns Following Paper’s Decision Not to Endorse Presidential Candidate
The editorials editor of The Los Angeles Times has decided to resign from the paper in the wake of its decision not to endorse a presidential candidate in the 2024 race.
“I am resigning because I want to make it clear that I am not okay with us being silent,” Mariel Garza said in an interview with the Columbia Journalism Review. “In dangerous times, honest people need to stand up. This is how I’m standing up.” In addition to being the editorials editor, Garza was a member of the paper’s editorial board.
More from The Hollywood Reporter
According to a report by Semafor published Tuesday, Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong blocked the paper’s editorial board from endorsing a candidate in the race even though the board was preparing a recommendation. On Wednesday, Garza appeared to confirm that account, telling CJR that Times Executive Editor Terry Tang conveyed Soon-Shiong’s wishes to Garza.
According to Garza, the board was ready to endorse Democratic candidate Kamala Harris for president and Garza had already begun writing an outline of an editorial to announce the decision. In the interview with CJR, Garza said that she didn’t believe this endorsement would sway Times readers’ voting decisions, given that the Times is a “very liberal paper.” However, the endorsement was important, she said, because “This is a point in time where you speak your conscience no matter what. And an endorsement was the logical next step after a series of editorials we’ve been writing about how dangerous Trump is to democracy, about his unfitness to be president, about his threats to jail his enemies.”
She added that an endorsement was a “logical next step” and that “it’s perplexing to readers, and possibly suspicious, that we didn’t endorse her this time.”
In her resignation letter published by CJR, Garza wrote that “the non-endorsement undermines the integrity of the editorial board and every single endorsement we make, down to school board races.” She wrote, “People will justifiably wonder if each endorsement was a decision made by a group of journalists after extensive research and discussion, or through decree by the owner.”
In a message posted to X (formerly Twitter) on Wednesday afternoon, Times owner Soon-Shiong said that he had offered the editorial board the chance to write “a factual analysis of all the POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE policies by EACH candidate during their tenures at the White House, and how these policies affected the nation.” He had also asked the editorial board to present their vision for how policies outlined during the candidates’ campaigns might play out in the next four years if they were elected. “In this way, with this clear and non-partisan information side-by-side, our readers could decide who would be worthy of being President for the next four years,” he wrote.
“Instead of adopting this path as suggested, the Editorial Board chose to remain silent and I accepted their decision. Please #vote,” Soon-Shiong added.
THR has reached out to the Times for comment.
Best of The Hollywood Reporter
Sign up for THR's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Solve the daily Crossword
