Second Amendment: Supreme Court to decide whether domestic abusers are entitled to guns

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court agreed Friday to wade back into Second Amendment rights, announcing it will decide whether the government may ban domestic abusers from owning a gun.

The decision to grant the case thrusts a major controversy onto the high court's docket for the term that will begin in October. The justices are likely to hear arguments in the fall and hand down a decision next year.

Zackey Rahimi is appealing his conviction of violating a federal law that prohibits Americans from possessing a firearm while they are the subject of a restraining order. He argues the Supreme Court's landmark decision last year striking down a New York gun law means the federal law also violates the Second Amendment.

Last year's decision struck down a New York law that limited who may obtain a license to carry a handgun in public. As part of that decision, the 6-3 majority ruled that gun regulations must be "consistent with this nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation."

Next: Guns for domestic abusers? Skirts at school? A look at what may be next at the Supreme Court

That new standard has set off a flurry of work by states and gun control advocates to find historical antecedents to modern-day gun regulations. A federal appeals court in Louisiana earlier this year sided with Rahimi, finding that the law was a historical "outlier that our ancestors would never have accepted."

Rahimi was involved in five shootings around Arlington, Texas, from late 2020 to early 2021. Police identified him as a suspect, obtained a warrant to search his home and found a rifle and a pistol. They also found a copy of a restraining order issued against him in 2020 after a physical fight with his girlfriend.

The case is U.S. v. Rahimi.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Guns: Supreme Court to decide if domestic abusers may own firearms